Scott Gilbertson at webmonkey writes an article on Google OS (full article at http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/Five_Questions_About_Google_Chrome_OS) also Ron Schenone at Lockergnome has some considerations on Google OS (full article at http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/07/10/google-chrome-operating-system-is-kind-of-an-anti-operating-system) and Christian Zibreg at Geek.com (full article at http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/because-its-free-googles-os-spells-trouble-for-redmond-2009079).

I recall what I wrote some days ago:

“I’m feeling that for an economic interest we are taking a leap back, where everybody’s got his own OS.

I’m not for or against Microsoft.

But I also think that the standardizations we have these days are an achievements on IT side and informatics diffusion.

Advantages are on part of Google OS project, but incoherencies (such as bundled browser)and quite total dependencies on internet should be taken into account”.

This post as a comment at http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/Five_Questions_About_Google_Chrome_OS#comments and at http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2009/07/10/google-chrome-operating-system-is-kind-of-an-anti-operating-system/#comment-186758 and at http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/because-its-free-googles-os-spells-trouble-for-redmond-2009079/comment-page-1/#comment-1638041